Warning: Undefined array key "language" in /customers/3/0/2/riff-raff.se/httpd.www/wiki/lib/tpl/old_sic/my_tpl_helper.php on line 129
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision
Previous revision
Next revision
|
Previous revision
|
en:riff-raff:introduction_to_riff-raff8 [Y-m-dH:i]
titorelli |
en:riff-raff:introduction_to_riff-raff8 [Y-m-dH:i] (current)
titorelli |
| > Exploitation makes it possible to build class struggle as contradiction, what is to say: a reciprocal but non-symetrical implication (subsumption); a process in contradiction with its own reproduction (the fall of the rate of profit), a whole of which each element exists only as a definition of its other in contradiction with it and from there with itself (productive labour and accumulation of capital, surplus labour and necessary labour).((See //Théorie communiste// № 2, p. 10 and № 20, pp. 71--72; pp. 78--79; p. 170; p. 190.)) | > Exploitation makes it possible to build class struggle as contradiction, what is to say: a reciprocal but non-symetrical implication (subsumption); a process in contradiction with its own reproduction (the fall of the rate of profit), a whole of which each element exists only as a definition of its other in contradiction with it and from there with itself (productive labour and accumulation of capital, surplus labour and necessary labour).((See //Théorie communiste// № 2, p. 10 and № 20, pp. 71--72; pp. 78--79; p. 170; p. 190.)) |
| > | > |
| > All this only functions if we achieve understanding the fall of the rate of profit as a contradiction between the classes and as a questionning of the proletarait by itself in the movement when the whole is, in its dynamics, contradictory to itself as the activity of a class.((See //Théorie communiste// № 20, p. 54)) (Roland Simon in an e-mail to riff-raff, September 14, 2006) | > All this only functions if we achieve understanding the fall of the rate of profit as a contradiction between the classes and as a questioning of the proletarat by itself in the movement when the whole is, in its dynamics, contradictory to itself as the activity of a class.((See //Théorie communiste// № 20, p. 54.)) (Roland Simon in an e-mail to riff-raff, September 14, 2006) |
| |
| ==== From self-organisation to communisation ==== | ==== From self-organisation to communisation ==== |